Logo

Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?

14.06.2025 02:52

Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?

Mt 19 is about Divorce. Jesus’ reference to Celibacy is that it is a gift from God and that not everyone can receive it.

Right?

Why is it the Legalists always run to the Law?

3 Subtle Signs Your Relationship Is Near Its End — By A Psychologist - Forbes

Answer to: Why does the God of the Bible condemn homosexual acts?

(What do you think he would write a line or two about?)

Didn’t they read Galatians? Romans? James and his “Law of Liberty.” The entire New Testament? You can even find Grace in the Old Testament, some of the Rabbis have.

Who's your celebrity crush?

Since Paul is who most homophobes run to in order to support their case, I went to him first, there really isn’t much left.

Try to break free from the shackles of it and you will find yourself outside the fold Pastor.

Inhospitable, loathsome, yet leave it to homophobia to twist it and miss it (the verse they use in Jude fails the test because of this).

Why do men like low maintenance women?

Further Musings:

What? It’s okay for David to be both a man after God’s own heart and a Bloody Bipolar Adulterer who even desecrated what was holy, as long as he wasn’t Bisexual, right? Lol

Men interpret Scriptures certain ways, but Jesus said we make void the Word by our tradition. Groupthink is tradition.

How has your life changed for the past 10 years? Can you share your #10year challenge? Is your life better, worse, or still hopeful?

If anything, Paul was writing about male prostitutes, not LGBT.

Those women were shunned, shamed, casted out and abandoned. The man had all the power and Jesus dared to challenge that. Even His disciples were astounded.

Today we have Divorce courts, protections, child custody, child and spousal support.

Montana warns of new disease-carrying tick species in the state - KREM

In Romans chapter 1, verses 26–27 are cherry-picked out of the context which starts in verse 18. The context is Idolatry.

Where?

I am not a Jewish man. I’m am not under any part of the Law for my righteousness. To place myself under the Law for my righteous standing with God would be to put myself under the curse of the Law listed in Dt 28.

What movies have not aged well?

Last, Leviticus. Two almost identical verses. One sex act (If translated correctly. The Hebrew words are sparse. People debate everything).

Sodom and Gomorrah. Two cities completely filled with Gay men, young and old. Cities who recently had gone to war, who Abraham had rescued, who Lot went back to live among, who tried to rape two angels that they mistook for men … I guess.

Him and I are good and that’s all I need.

I’ve a dismissive avoidant partner who said that he’s overwhelmed by our relationship and that he wants to break up, how do I get him back?

Christ bringing up Genesis is not Him being exclusionary, it is Him reminding these lecherous men that their wives are bound to their hearts.

These were common in that culture in Athens, Corinth, Ephesus, Rome, and Crete, all places Paul went. They existed centuries after Paul.

Many believe Paul is writing about what he sees, temples that have male and female prostitutes engaged in ritual activities.

Since the Brits can't steer their oil tanker, what makes them think they can take on Russia?

No. Rape is violence, not sex. The story is about kidnapping into slavery and the abuse of strangers.

If you embrace the fact that David “embraced” Jonathan and God was cool with it, you find that your concepts about what God “hates” get thrown out.

The truth is, the Old Testament and New Testaments say next to nothing and sexual orientation is a relatively new concept.

Brewers Move Aaron Civale To Bullpen - MLB Trade Rumors

Christ bore that, so, hard pass, thanks.

Homophobia is a billion dollar business for Corporate Christianity. Isn’t it?

Why can’t some Christians?

Liquid Glass is more than skin deep on macOS Tahoe - AppleInsider

There were Male Shrine Prostitutes in the OT book of Kings, that practice was old in Paul’s time. Many dismiss the idea based what seem to be personal or sociological reasons, not archaeological ones.

Scholars and translators know this. The Greek translation of Arsenokoitace is uncertain. The word was coined by Paul (probably) or a contemporary of his. Any person who says they know exactly what Paul meant is lying (seriously).

Does He?

How could NASA possibly land on the moon when it's impossible to reach the moon through the Earth's dome? Why are they making up such an obvious lie?

No one knows.

(So please, before you enforce celibacy on another, castrate yourself … or leave other people alone?)